Context you can actually trust.
Agents that check your company’s documents around the clock, and write the answers nobody ever got around to writing.
It is all written down already. Usually twice, and the two disagree.
Synaply reads every one of these where it sits, with the permissions it already has. Nothing to migrate. No third copy for your team to keep in sync.
Missing one? Tell us what your team lives in and we will add it.
Three steps, then it runs itself.
No migration, no rollout plan, and nothing new for your team to learn. After setup the agents do the work continuously, not on a quarterly review cycle.
Connect the tools your team lives in. Everything stays where it is, with the permissions it already carries.
You write the standard once, in your own words. An agent applies it to every document that qualifies and re-runs the moment one changes.
When a question has no good answer, a workflow writes one from your own material, cites it, and sends it for checking before anyone reads it.
Verification agents that never stop checking.
You write the standard once. An agent applies it to every document that qualifies, day and night, and checks each one again the moment it changes. A person can also sign off directly when that is quicker.
For the handful where someone on your team already knows the answer. No agent, no checklist, no queue.
Runs continuously. Checks every document that qualifies, and a point you marked required cannot be outvoted by the four that passed.
Change one line and every sign-off drops, and the agent picks it up again within minutes. Nothing carries over from last year's draft.
It only appears on documents you can already open. If you cannot see the document, you will not know it exists.
Security's bar is not Legal's bar. Each agent answers separately, so a document can clear one and fail another. You see both, not an average.
The best answer in your company is sitting in someone’s DMs.
It never gets written up, because writing it up is work nobody is paid for. Synaply reads only what that one person can already read, leaves out what should stay private, and lets them publish the one useful sentence with their name on it.
- Nothing goes out until that person says so
- Never quietly edited afterwards. A correction goes out as its own update
- Each reader sees only the sources they can open, and no count of the rest
- Nobody needs to sign off on it. Most of these never need checking.
Pilots with one named owner on the customer side closed in nine days. The average is twenty-one.
Your company exists in nine systems. Synaply makes it one.
Every tool holds a different fragment, spelled differently, half of it stale. Synaply reads all of them, figures out what is the same thing, cleans it up, and keeps a live map of who is allowed to see what.
Which people matter, which projects are live, what your team calls things. That picture sharpens every time anything is added.
Five spellings of one customer across five systems resolve to one record. Contradictions between sources get surfaced rather than buried.
Every source, every folder, every private channel. When someone's access changes, what Synaply will show them changes with it.
Your AI assistant is confidently wrong about your company.
It has never read your handbook. Connect it to Synaply once and it answers from your own material, names who checked that material, and sees only what the person asking can see.
- One connection
Not a plugin per tool, and nobody pasting confidential documents into a chat box.
- It borrows permissions, it does not grant them
An assistant cannot surface a document its user could not open themselves.
- Ask for checked material only
Anything nobody has signed off on stays out of the answer entirely.
“How do we take away a contractor’s VPN access when they finish?”
And adds: only material someone has actually checked.
It finds the gap, then it closes the gap.
A knowledge gap is a question your company keeps asking and cannot answer. Synaply spots them, writes the missing answer from your own material, cites every source, and puts it through a verification agent before a single person reads it. Nobody has to open a ticket.
- A document is edited, so every sign-off drops and an agent re-checks it within minutes
- Fourteen people ask the same thing and get nothing, so a gap is opened automatically
- The workflow writes the answer, cites the sources, and sends it for verification
- Not enough evidence, so it stays open and says why. Nothing is invented to close a gap.
Your originals are never touched. Anything the workflow writes is a separate document, clearly marked as one, with every source listed.
Put an agent on your documentation this week.
Point us to one folder. We will run a verification agent across it and show you what passes, what fails and on which point, and which questions your team keeps asking with no answer behind them.