Context you can actually trust.
Agents that check your company’s knowledge around the clock, and write the answers nobody ever got around to writing.
It is all written down already. Usually twice, and the two disagree.
Synaply reads every one of these where it sits, with the permissions it already has. Nothing to migrate. No third copy for your team to keep in sync.
Missing one? Tell us what your team lives in and we will add it.
Three steps, then it runs itself.
No migration, no rollout plan, and nothing new for your team to learn. After setup the agents do the work continuously, not on a quarterly review cycle.
Connect the tools your team lives in. Everything stays where it is, with the permissions it already carries.
Describe what matters, like your sales playbook, onboarding SOPs or security policies. Synaply searches every tool for every version, works out which one is current, and you confirm it in one click.
When a question has no good answer, a workflow writes one from your own material, cites it, and sends it for checking before anyone reads it.
Every document you rely on, kept true.
Point Synaply at the documents that matter. It finds every copy across your tools, you confirm the real ones, and an agent reviews them for you whenever they change, age, or a newer version shows up anywhere.
The real version gets a badge in search and in every AI answer. Look-alikes, drafts and old copies rank below it.
When something changes, the agent does the legwork: compares versions, checks your rules, and tells you exactly what moved.
A newer copy in a Slack thread or an email attachment still gets caught, even in a tool you never pointed it at.
It only appears on documents you can already open. If you cannot see the document, you will not know it exists.
Sales materials, customer contracts, security policies. Each has its own owner, rules and review rhythm.
The best answer in your company is sitting in someone’s DMs.
It never gets written up, because writing it up is work nobody is paid for. Synaply reads only what that one person can already read, leaves out what should stay private, and lets them publish the one useful sentence with their name on it.
- Nothing goes out until that person says so
- Never quietly edited afterwards. A correction goes out as its own update
- Each reader sees only the sources they can open, and no count of the rest
- Nobody needs to sign off on it. Most of these never need checking.
Pilots with one named owner on the customer side closed in nine days. The average is twenty-one.
Your company exists in nine systems. Synaply makes it one.
Every tool holds a different fragment, spelled differently, half of it stale. Synaply reads all of them, figures out what is the same thing, cleans it up, and keeps a live map of who is allowed to see what.
Which people matter, which projects are live, what your team calls things. That picture sharpens every time anything is added.
Five spellings of one customer across five systems resolve to one record. Contradictions between sources get surfaced rather than buried.
Every source, every folder, every private channel. When someone's access changes, what Synaply will show them changes with it.
Your AI assistant is confidently wrong about your company.
It has never read your handbook. Connect it to Synaply once and it answers from your own material, names who checked that material, and sees only what the person asking can see.
- One connection
Not a plugin per tool, and nobody pasting confidential documents into a chat box.
- It borrows permissions, it does not grant them
An assistant cannot surface a document its user could not open themselves.
- Ask for checked material only
Anything nobody has signed off on stays out of the answer entirely.
“How do we take away a contractor’s VPN access when they finish?”
And adds: only material someone has actually checked.
Every unanswered question becomes a runbook.
Synaply hears what your company keeps asking and never gets a straight answer to. It drafts the missing runbook from your own material, cites every source, and hands it to the right owner to approve. Nobody files a ticket. Nobody starts from a blank page.
- Fourteen people ask the same thing and get nothing useful, so a gap opens automatically
- A trusted document goes stale or something your team relies on is missing, so a gap opens
- It drafts the answer or runbook from your own material, cites every source, and sends it for review
- Not enough evidence, so it stays open and says why. Nothing is invented to close a gap.
Your originals are never touched. Anything the workflow writes is a separate document, clearly marked as one, with every source listed.
Put an agent on your documentation this week.
Point us at one kind of document. We will find every copy across your tools, show you which one is real, which are stale or duplicated, and which questions your team keeps asking with no answer behind them.